<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1058 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on the appellants under Order-in-Original by the Commissioner of Central Tax &amp;amp; GST, Thane. The penalties were deemed withdrawn under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, with one appeal already withdrawn and Form-4 issued. Although the appellants applied for settlement under SVLDRS, Form-4 was pending issuance. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of &quot;mens rea&quot; in imposing penalties, following precedents from Karnataka and Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Courts. Relying on these precedents, the Tribunal disposed of the appeals, noting that penalties on employees would not stand once the main company&#039;s duty demand issue was settled under SVLDRS.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1058 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on the appellants under Order-in-Original by the Commissioner of Central Tax &amp;amp; GST, Thane. The penalties were deemed withdrawn under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, with one appeal already withdrawn and Form-4 issued. Although the appellants applied for settlement under SVLDRS, Form-4 was pending issuance. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of &quot;mens rea&quot; in imposing penalties, following precedents from Karnataka and Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Courts. Relying on these precedents, the Tribunal disposed of the appeals, noting that penalties on employees would not stand once the main company&#039;s duty demand issue was settled under SVLDRS.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>