<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1052 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417587</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the revenue against the ITAT order for the assessment year 2007-08. The court ruled that the surplus amount of the transaction should be treated as an exchange and not as long term capital gains under the Income Tax Act, referencing the definitions of slump sale and transfer. Additionally, disallowances of various expenses to non-residents were upheld due to tax implications and failure to deduct TDS, with detailed reasoning provided for each issue raised by the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1052 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417587</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the revenue against the ITAT order for the assessment year 2007-08. The court ruled that the surplus amount of the transaction should be treated as an exchange and not as long term capital gains under the Income Tax Act, referencing the definitions of slump sale and transfer. Additionally, disallowances of various expenses to non-residents were upheld due to tax implications and failure to deduct TDS, with detailed reasoning provided for each issue raised by the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>