<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1049 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings for the assessment years 1990-91 and 1991-92, ruling that the reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was invalid. The Tribunal held that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment, and the reopening beyond four years was not justified. As a result, the appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1049 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings for the assessment years 1990-91 and 1991-92, ruling that the reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was invalid. The Tribunal held that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment, and the reopening beyond four years was not justified. As a result, the appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>