<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1040 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417575</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the disallowance of Labour charges at Rs. 18,06,027, reducing it to Rs. 1.00 lakh based on the lack of verifiable vouchers and the erroneous reference to vouchers belonging to a different entity. The ITAT&#039;s decision was made after considering the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, ultimately partially allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1040 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417575</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the disallowance of Labour charges at Rs. 18,06,027, reducing it to Rs. 1.00 lakh based on the lack of verifiable vouchers and the erroneous reference to vouchers belonging to a different entity. The ITAT&#039;s decision was made after considering the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, ultimately partially allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>