<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1009 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417544</link>
    <description>Interest under the sales tax law is compensatory and automatic on delayed payment of the correct tax, so a deposit made during appeal may be appropriated in accordance with that liability rather than treated as tax payment first. The Court also accepted that assessment and rectification orders are distinct, and the Tribunal&#039;s interference with the assessment and interest computation was unsustainable in light of binding precedent on compensatory interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1009 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417544</link>
      <description>Interest under the sales tax law is compensatory and automatic on delayed payment of the correct tax, so a deposit made during appeal may be appropriated in accordance with that liability rather than treated as tax payment first. The Court also accepted that assessment and rectification orders are distinct, and the Tribunal&#039;s interference with the assessment and interest computation was unsustainable in light of binding precedent on compensatory interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>