https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417541 A challenge to a Rs. 50,000 penalty imposed while granting anticipatory bail in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act matter failed, as the petitioner had earlier obtained additional time to deposit the amount without questioning that order. The record of repeated non-appearance, cancellation of bail, issuance of warrants, adjournments, and earlier costs supported the view that the petitioner was estopped from disputing the earlier order. In these circumstances, the High Court held that the penalty was appropriate and in accordance with law, and no interference under Section 482 CrPC was warranted. en-us Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:40:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417541 A challenge to a Rs. 50,000 penalty imposed while granting anticipatory bail in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act matter failed, as the petitioner had earlier obtained additional time to deposit the amount without questioning that order. The record of repeated non-appearance, cancellation of bail, issuance of warrants, adjournments, and earlier costs supported the view that the petitioner was estopped from disputing the earlier order. In these circumstances, the High Court held that the penalty was appropriate and in accordance with law, and no interference under Section 482 CrPC was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417541