<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1307 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, highlighting the lack of establishment of &quot;mens rea&quot; for imposing penalties under Rule 26 and the applicability of the SVLDRS for waiving penalties if proper applications are made. The decision was based on court interpretations and the SVLDRS scheme, ultimately setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:29:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1307 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, highlighting the lack of establishment of &quot;mens rea&quot; for imposing penalties under Rule 26 and the applicability of the SVLDRS for waiving penalties if proper applications are made. The decision was based on court interpretations and the SVLDRS scheme, ultimately setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>