<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1330 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300352</link>
    <description>Approved resolution plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bind the Central and State Governments, and claims not included in the plan stand extinguished; the State&#039;s pre-CIRP dues therefore could not be enforced through continuing prohibitory entries over the petitioner&#039;s properties. The Court also held that the land could not be treated as unavailable for registration on the footing that it was agricultural land, because the material showed long-standing industrial use for an iron and steel unit and the revenue description could not override actual user. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned prohibitory requests and consequential proceedings were declared invalid, and alienation documents were to be considered if otherwise lawful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:29:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1330 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300352</link>
      <description>Approved resolution plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bind the Central and State Governments, and claims not included in the plan stand extinguished; the State&#039;s pre-CIRP dues therefore could not be enforced through continuing prohibitory entries over the petitioner&#039;s properties. The Court also held that the land could not be treated as unavailable for registration on the footing that it was agricultural land, because the material showed long-standing industrial use for an iron and steel unit and the revenue description could not override actual user. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned prohibitory requests and consequential proceedings were declared invalid, and alienation documents were to be considered if otherwise lawful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>