<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1392 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300349</link>
    <description>An expressway-style peripheral ring road falls within the highway category under the EIA regime, so prior environmental clearance is required where the project is in substance a high-speed, access-controlled road with interchanges and toll plazas. The project was treated as commencing only after final notification following government sanction, not at the preliminary acquisition stage. The appraisal process was found non-compliant because the terms of reference had expired, the primary data were outdated, and the environmental impact assessment did not fully and coherently address forest land and tree-felling issues. The record also showed perfunctory scrutiny by the appraisal committee, with post facto attempts to cure defects held inadequate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1392 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300349</link>
      <description>An expressway-style peripheral ring road falls within the highway category under the EIA regime, so prior environmental clearance is required where the project is in substance a high-speed, access-controlled road with interchanges and toll plazas. The project was treated as commencing only after final notification following government sanction, not at the preliminary acquisition stage. The appraisal process was found non-compliant because the terms of reference had expired, the primary data were outdated, and the environmental impact assessment did not fully and coherently address forest land and tree-felling issues. The record also showed perfunctory scrutiny by the appraisal committee, with post facto attempts to cure defects held inadequate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>