<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1914 (3) TMI 5 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300336</link>
    <description>An arbitral award may be challenged for misconduct, corruption or partiality only on statutory grounds that are affirmatively proved; mere criticism of the procedure, absence of detailed notes, or the manner in which evidence was gathered is insufficient unless it shows denial of a proper hearing or a procedure so defective as to amount to misconduct. Matters within the arbitrator&#039;s jurisdiction, including valuation and allocation, are not reappraised by the court absent proof of dishonest motive, bias or partiality. On the stated facts, the alleged irregularities and allegations of corruption were not established, so the award was not liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1914 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:01:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1914 (3) TMI 5 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300336</link>
      <description>An arbitral award may be challenged for misconduct, corruption or partiality only on statutory grounds that are affirmatively proved; mere criticism of the procedure, absence of detailed notes, or the manner in which evidence was gathered is insufficient unless it shows denial of a proper hearing or a procedure so defective as to amount to misconduct. Matters within the arbitrator&#039;s jurisdiction, including valuation and allocation, are not reappraised by the court absent proof of dishonest motive, bias or partiality. On the stated facts, the alleged irregularities and allegations of corruption were not established, so the award was not liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1914 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>