<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1268 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300332</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The court directed deductions under section 80HHC to include transit income and cash discounts, disallowed ESIC payments were to be verified for timely payment, unutilized Modvat credit adjustment reconsidered, depreciation on closed unit assets allowed, rental income classified as income from house property, and interest under section 234D withdrawn for refunds granted pre-June 1, 2003. The decision was pronounced on March 18, 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1268 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300332</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The court directed deductions under section 80HHC to include transit income and cash discounts, disallowed ESIC payments were to be verified for timely payment, unutilized Modvat credit adjustment reconsidered, depreciation on closed unit assets allowed, rental income classified as income from house property, and interest under section 234D withdrawn for refunds granted pre-June 1, 2003. The decision was pronounced on March 18, 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>