<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 989 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417524</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to ESI and PF was not justified as the payments were made before the due date of filing the return of income. The ITAT allowed both appeals, emphasizing that the issue was covered by previous decisions favoring the assessee. Consequently, the additions made by disallowing delayed payments were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 989 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417524</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to ESI and PF was not justified as the payments were made before the due date of filing the return of income. The ITAT allowed both appeals, emphasizing that the issue was covered by previous decisions favoring the assessee. Consequently, the additions made by disallowing delayed payments were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>