<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 971 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application, remanding the case for verification of the claimed reversal of CENVAT credit. The original authority was directed to decide within three months, considering the reversal entries in the ST-3 returns and the appellant&#039;s bonafides. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was sent for re-examination according to the provided directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 971 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application, remanding the case for verification of the claimed reversal of CENVAT credit. The original authority was directed to decide within three months, considering the reversal entries in the ST-3 returns and the appellant&#039;s bonafides. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was sent for re-examination according to the provided directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>