https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417501 Divergent departmental views on eligibility to Cenvat credit showed that the dispute was interpretational, so invocation of the extended period of limitation was not justified. Where similarly placed assessees had been allowed credit and the Revenue had challenged those orders, the demand could not be sustained on limitation. The denial of credit was therefore held barred by limitation, and the assessee succeeded. en-us Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:44:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417501 Divergent departmental views on eligibility to Cenvat credit showed that the dispute was interpretational, so invocation of the extended period of limitation was not justified. Where similarly placed assessees had been allowed credit and the Revenue had challenged those orders, the demand could not be sustained on limitation. The denial of credit was therefore held barred by limitation, and the assessee succeeded. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417501