<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 43 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27815</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka held that rule IBB can be applied as a procedural rule in pending matters. The court rejected civil petitions challenging the applicability of the rule, stating that rules of procedure can be enforced in ongoing cases without raising any legal issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:07:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 43 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27815</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka held that rule IBB can be applied as a procedural rule in pending matters. The court rejected civil petitions challenging the applicability of the rule, stating that rules of procedure can be enforced in ongoing cases without raising any legal issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>