https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417485 The Court directed the petitioner, a registered dealer under the CGST Act and the TSGST Act, to pay a penalty within four weeks for the release of seized goods and vehicle due to an alleged lack of a valid e-way bill. The petitioner's challenge to the detention and tax determination orders was dismissed, with the Court clarifying that the penalty payment was solely for the release of the vehicle. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs, and the interim application was also resolved accordingly. en-us Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:53:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417485 The Court directed the petitioner, a registered dealer under the CGST Act and the TSGST Act, to pay a penalty within four weeks for the release of seized goods and vehicle due to an alleged lack of a valid e-way bill. The petitioner's challenge to the detention and tax determination orders was dismissed, with the Court clarifying that the penalty payment was solely for the release of the vehicle. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs, and the interim application was also resolved accordingly. Case-Laws GST Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417485