<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 940 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment order as it found that the issues raised by the LD. Pr.CIT were not prejudicial to the Revenue. The disallowance of professional fees and transport expenses, mismatch of sales turnover, improper verification of sundry creditors, and interest on refund were all deemed non-prejudicial. The appeal was allowed on 20th January 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:52:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 940 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment order as it found that the issues raised by the LD. Pr.CIT were not prejudicial to the Revenue. The disallowance of professional fees and transport expenses, mismatch of sales turnover, improper verification of sundry creditors, and interest on refund were all deemed non-prejudicial. The appeal was allowed on 20th January 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>