<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 918 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417453</link>
    <description>The Subordinate Judge dismissed the suit filed by the Appellant seeking various reliefs related to property ownership and settlement deed nullification. Both lower courts ruled in favor of the 3rd Defendant, the Appellant&#039;s sister, finding insufficient evidence to support the Appellant&#039;s claims of property purchase and ownership. The Appellate Judge noted inconsistencies in the Appellant&#039;s claims and concluded that the Appellant&#039;s possession of the property was forcible and lacked legal basis. The Second Appeal was dismissed without costs as no substantial legal issues warranted further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 918 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417453</link>
      <description>The Subordinate Judge dismissed the suit filed by the Appellant seeking various reliefs related to property ownership and settlement deed nullification. Both lower courts ruled in favor of the 3rd Defendant, the Appellant&#039;s sister, finding insufficient evidence to support the Appellant&#039;s claims of property purchase and ownership. The Appellate Judge noted inconsistencies in the Appellant&#039;s claims and concluded that the Appellant&#039;s possession of the property was forcible and lacked legal basis. The Second Appeal was dismissed without costs as no substantial legal issues warranted further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>