<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 911 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH (COURT-II)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for restoration of the company name in the register under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Appellant Company failed to provide substantial evidence of ongoing operations or valid reasons for restoration. The judgment emphasized the importance of meeting statutory requirements and demonstrating business activities to support restoration claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:50:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 911 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH (COURT-II)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for restoration of the company name in the register under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Appellant Company failed to provide substantial evidence of ongoing operations or valid reasons for restoration. The judgment emphasized the importance of meeting statutory requirements and demonstrating business activities to support restoration claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>