<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1595 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection for statistical purposes. It directed the Assessing Officer to treat interest as a capital receipt if linked to the purchase of assets and as income from other sources if related to surplus funds. The deductibility of interest expenditure was to be determined based on the treatment of interest income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 20:01:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1595 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection for statistical purposes. It directed the Assessing Officer to treat interest as a capital receipt if linked to the purchase of assets and as income from other sources if related to surplus funds. The deductibility of interest expenditure was to be determined based on the treatment of interest income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>