<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1247 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300308</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, directing the deletion of additions made by the AO and granting the claimed exemptions under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of substantive evidence directly implicating the assessee in the alleged transactions and highlighted the importance of legal evidence over mere suspicion. The orders were pronounced on 16/02/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 20:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1247 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300308</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, directing the deletion of additions made by the AO and granting the claimed exemptions under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of substantive evidence directly implicating the assessee in the alleged transactions and highlighted the importance of legal evidence over mere suspicion. The orders were pronounced on 16/02/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>