<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1225 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300312</link>
    <description>A conviction for an offence involving moral turpitude was treated as a statutory disqualification under the Chartered Accountants Act, even though the offence pre-dated enrolment, because the focus is on the conviction and the nature of the offence rather than when the conduct occurred. The provision was read as a bar to both entry on and continued retention in the register, subject only to any pardon. Proceedings based on that disqualification were held distinct from professional misconduct proceedings, so a prior disciplinary inquiry was not required before removal action could proceed, although notice and a hearing remained necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 20:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1225 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300312</link>
      <description>A conviction for an offence involving moral turpitude was treated as a statutory disqualification under the Chartered Accountants Act, even though the offence pre-dated enrolment, because the focus is on the conviction and the nature of the offence rather than when the conduct occurred. The provision was read as a bar to both entry on and continued retention in the register, subject only to any pardon. Proceedings based on that disqualification were held distinct from professional misconduct proceedings, so a prior disciplinary inquiry was not required before removal action could proceed, although notice and a hearing remained necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>