<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 900 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417435</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the notice for reopening the assessment for the assessment year 2012-13 was invalid due to impermissible change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, failure to disclose material facts, and reliance on audit objections without independent application of mind. The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice and rejecting the respondents&#039; objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2022 08:50:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 900 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417435</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the notice for reopening the assessment for the assessment year 2012-13 was invalid due to impermissible change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, failure to disclose material facts, and reliance on audit objections without independent application of mind. The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice and rejecting the respondents&#039; objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>