<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 894 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The reassessment was deemed invalid due to being beyond the time limit, based on a change of opinion without fresh material, and lack of full disclosure by the assessee. The original assessment was considered sufficient, and the reassessment order was held to be time-barred. The appeal of the assessee was fully allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2022 08:50:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 894 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The reassessment was deemed invalid due to being beyond the time limit, based on a change of opinion without fresh material, and lack of full disclosure by the assessee. The original assessment was considered sufficient, and the reassessment order was held to be time-barred. The appeal of the assessee was fully allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>