<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 892 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 for the assessment year 2015-16 unjustified and invalid. The addition on unexplained cash deposits was deemed erroneous, as it should have been taxed under section 115BBE(1) at a flat rate of 30%. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a reasonable basis for revisionary actions and considering practical and moral aspects in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2022 08:49:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 892 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 for the assessment year 2015-16 unjustified and invalid. The addition on unexplained cash deposits was deemed erroneous, as it should have been taxed under section 115BBE(1) at a flat rate of 30%. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a reasonable basis for revisionary actions and considering practical and moral aspects in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>