<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty notice issued to the assessee was invalid due to its failure to specify the charge, thereby lacking jurisdiction. Consequently, the penalty levied was quashed. The Tribunal did not engage in the merits of the case as the primary issue of jurisdiction rendered it unnecessary. The adjudication applied mutatis mutandis to all the appeals for different assessment years, leading to the partial allowance of the appeals by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 21:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty notice issued to the assessee was invalid due to its failure to specify the charge, thereby lacking jurisdiction. Consequently, the penalty levied was quashed. The Tribunal did not engage in the merits of the case as the primary issue of jurisdiction rendered it unnecessary. The adjudication applied mutatis mutandis to all the appeals for different assessment years, leading to the partial allowance of the appeals by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>