<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 872 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat the excess stock and cash as business income, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that it should be considered income from undisclosed sources. Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act was deemed inapplicable due to the retrospective nature of the relevant amendment. The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings for both parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2022 08:48:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 872 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat the excess stock and cash as business income, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that it should be considered income from undisclosed sources. Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act was deemed inapplicable due to the retrospective nature of the relevant amendment. The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings for both parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>