<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 31 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27796</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee was entitled to a deduction under section 32(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act for discarded dies used in the manufacturing process, despite the machinery&#039;s first use in the previous year. The court emphasized strict construction of the provision, allowing the deduction. The court did not address arguments related to other sections of the Act and ordered each party to bear its own costs as the upheld contention was not raised before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 31 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27796</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee was entitled to a deduction under section 32(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act for discarded dies used in the manufacturing process, despite the machinery&#039;s first use in the previous year. The court emphasized strict construction of the provision, allowing the deduction. The court did not address arguments related to other sections of the Act and ordered each party to bear its own costs as the upheld contention was not raised before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>