https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417401 The Court directed respondent Nos.2 and 3 to reconsider the petitioner's submission under the SVLDR Scheme, 2019, after finding that the petitioner's application was timely submitted but not adequately considered. The Court emphasized the importance of evaluating the petitioner's case in accordance with the relevant Circular and ordered that the show cause notice should not be enforced until a decision is made by the respondents. All points on merits were left open, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jan 2022 08:47:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417401 The Court directed respondent Nos.2 and 3 to reconsider the petitioner's submission under the SVLDR Scheme, 2019, after finding that the petitioner's application was timely submitted but not adequately considered. The Court emphasized the importance of evaluating the petitioner's case in accordance with the relevant Circular and ordered that the show cause notice should not be enforced until a decision is made by the respondents. All points on merits were left open, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417401