https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300292 Stage carriage permit applications had to be assessed by the transport authority in a quasi-judicial manner on an unfettered evaluation of competing claims. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 permitted State directions only for administrative functions, not to control quasi-judicial decision-making. Because the Tribunal treated the Government Order as a governing standard and used it to influence preference between rival claims, the determination was vitiated. The High Court was therefore right to quash the Tribunal's order and require reconsideration without being bound by the impugned Government Order. en-us Tue, 29 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:06:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300292 Stage carriage permit applications had to be assessed by the transport authority in a quasi-judicial manner on an unfettered evaluation of competing claims. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 permitted State directions only for administrative functions, not to control quasi-judicial decision-making. Because the Tribunal treated the Government Order as a governing standard and used it to influence preference between rival claims, the determination was vitiated. The High Court was therefore right to quash the Tribunal's order and require reconsideration without being bound by the impugned Government Order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300292