https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300287 A writ petition challenging a penalty under Section 271FA of the Income-tax Act was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 246A(1)(q) before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Court followed the view that an order imposing penalty for default in furnishing particulars under Section 285BA(i) is appealable, and therefore declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy under the Act. en-us Sat, 23 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:32:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300287 A writ petition challenging a penalty under Section 271FA of the Income-tax Act was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 246A(1)(q) before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Court followed the view that an order imposing penalty for default in furnishing particulars under Section 285BA(i) is appealable, and therefore declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy under the Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Sat, 23 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300287