https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300285 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeals challenging a resumption order on land. The court held that the resumption was legal under "old grant terms" and in accordance with established procedures, rejecting arguments of illegality and lack of natural justice. The appellants failed to prove ownership and their attempt to introduce new evidence late in the proceedings was deemed inappropriate. Previous case law requiring compliance with natural justice principles was distinguished, with the court emphasizing adherence to the process outlined in Union of India vs. Harish Chand Anand. The appeals were dismissed with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:59:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300285 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeals challenging a resumption order on land. The court held that the resumption was legal under "old grant terms" and in accordance with established procedures, rejecting arguments of illegality and lack of natural justice. The appellants failed to prove ownership and their attempt to introduce new evidence late in the proceedings was deemed inappropriate. Previous case law requiring compliance with natural justice principles was distinguished, with the court emphasizing adherence to the process outlined in Union of India vs. Harish Chand Anand. The appeals were dismissed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300285