https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300283 Persons holding Vaidya Visharad or Ayurved Ratna certificates issued after 1967 could not claim a right to practise Indian medicine unless they possessed a recognised qualification under the central statutory scheme. The 1967 cut-off in Entry No. 105 was treated as a recognition boundary, not an arbitrary restriction, because recognition had ceased from that point and later inclusion was not sought through the statutory mechanism. Registration in the State Register, or any inconsistent privilege under the Rajasthan Indian Medicine Act, 1953, could not override the central Act. The central qualification regime therefore prevailed, and the challenge based on Articles 14 and 19 failed. en-us Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:45:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300283 Persons holding Vaidya Visharad or Ayurved Ratna certificates issued after 1967 could not claim a right to practise Indian medicine unless they possessed a recognised qualification under the central statutory scheme. The 1967 cut-off in Entry No. 105 was treated as a recognition boundary, not an arbitrary restriction, because recognition had ceased from that point and later inclusion was not sought through the statutory mechanism. Registration in the State Register, or any inconsistent privilege under the Rajasthan Indian Medicine Act, 1953, could not override the central Act. The central qualification regime therefore prevailed, and the challenge based on Articles 14 and 19 failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300283