<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 853 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417388</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the petition challenging the provisional attachment of the bank account and blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger under CGST Rules. The court directed the respondents to de-freeze the account and unblock the ledger within three working days. Emphasizing the importance of compliance with investigative processes, the judgment highlighted the necessity of following legal procedures while protecting the petitioner&#039;s rights in relation to the attachment and blocking issues under the CGST Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 853 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417388</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the petition challenging the provisional attachment of the bank account and blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger under CGST Rules. The court directed the respondents to de-freeze the account and unblock the ledger within three working days. Emphasizing the importance of compliance with investigative processes, the judgment highlighted the necessity of following legal procedures while protecting the petitioner&#039;s rights in relation to the attachment and blocking issues under the CGST Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>