<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 835 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act for delayed filing of the audit report, citing that the delay was beyond the assessee&#039;s control and not intentional. The delay was attributed to search proceedings by the Department, affecting the availability of necessary documents for filing. The Tribunal found the explanations provided reasonable and undisputed, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and canceling the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:53:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 835 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act for delayed filing of the audit report, citing that the delay was beyond the assessee&#039;s control and not intentional. The delay was attributed to search proceedings by the Department, affecting the availability of necessary documents for filing. The Tribunal found the explanations provided reasonable and undisputed, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and canceling the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>