<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 812 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, accepting the declared value of the barge as the transaction value. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties imposed on the appellant and the Managing Director were overturned. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of cross-examination and the reliability of the initial valuation report, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness in customs valuation disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 812 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, accepting the declared value of the barge as the transaction value. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties imposed on the appellant and the Managing Director were overturned. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of cross-examination and the reliability of the initial valuation report, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness in customs valuation disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>