<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1288 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300282</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority disapproved of the Resolution Professional (RP) and Committee of Creditors (CoC) for not adhering to the specified timeline and unilaterally extending the decision deadline in violation of the order. Despite criticizing their actions, immediate liquidation was not ordered due to the completed voting process. The Authority emphasized the importance of timely resolution under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and directed the expedited conclusion of the process, stressing the need for strict adherence to resolution timelines and efficient proceedings. Injunction relief was not granted, but the judgment concluded without liquidation orders at that time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 20:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1288 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300282</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority disapproved of the Resolution Professional (RP) and Committee of Creditors (CoC) for not adhering to the specified timeline and unilaterally extending the decision deadline in violation of the order. Despite criticizing their actions, immediate liquidation was not ordered due to the completed voting process. The Authority emphasized the importance of timely resolution under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and directed the expedited conclusion of the process, stressing the need for strict adherence to resolution timelines and efficient proceedings. Injunction relief was not granted, but the judgment concluded without liquidation orders at that time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>