https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300271 The Punjab & Haryana HC held that the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 continued to apply to the Motor Market area after the 27.07.1994 notification, because the saving provision preserved the earlier development law alongside the municipal framework. It also held that conversion charges for changing a flat portion from residential to office or commercial use were valid regulatory charges arising from the statutory scheme governing site use and building restrictions, not amenity charges. Since the levy was not under the amenity provision, the challenge based on excessive delegation failed, and the writ petitions were left without merit. en-us Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:18:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300271 The Punjab & Haryana HC held that the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 continued to apply to the Motor Market area after the 27.07.1994 notification, because the saving provision preserved the earlier development law alongside the municipal framework. It also held that conversion charges for changing a flat portion from residential to office or commercial use were valid regulatory charges arising from the statutory scheme governing site use and building restrictions, not amenity charges. Since the levy was not under the amenity provision, the challenge based on excessive delegation failed, and the writ petitions were left without merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300271