https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300270 Regulation 6(1) of the Chandigarh Housing Board allotment rules barred residential allotment where the applicant, spouse, or dependent relations already owned a residential plot or house in Chandigarh, Mohali, or Panchkula. A sanctioned residential flat on the upper floors of a property whose ground floor was allotted for commercial use was treated as a residential house for this purpose because the family had already obtained a residential benefit. The respondent was therefore ineligible for the allotment, and cancellation of the plot was upheld. The deposited amount was directed to be refunded without interest. en-us Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:26:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300270 Regulation 6(1) of the Chandigarh Housing Board allotment rules barred residential allotment where the applicant, spouse, or dependent relations already owned a residential plot or house in Chandigarh, Mohali, or Panchkula. A sanctioned residential flat on the upper floors of a property whose ground floor was allotted for commercial use was treated as a residential house for this purpose because the family had already obtained a residential benefit. The respondent was therefore ineligible for the allotment, and cancellation of the plot was upheld. The deposited amount was directed to be refunded without interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300270