https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300269 Interference with an acquittal is justified only when the trial court's view is perverse, highly unreasonable, or based on irrelevant or inadmissible considerations; applying that standard, the High Court's reversal of acquittal was upheld because the trial court had rejected the prosecution on speculative grounds. Related eyewitnesses are not to be discarded merely because of relationship with the deceased, absent evidence of enmity or false implication, and non-examination of independent witnesses is not fatal where the eyewitness account is otherwise credible. On those principles, the conviction was sustained and the challenge to the acquittal failed. en-us Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:47:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300269 Interference with an acquittal is justified only when the trial court's view is perverse, highly unreasonable, or based on irrelevant or inadmissible considerations; applying that standard, the High Court's reversal of acquittal was upheld because the trial court had rejected the prosecution on speculative grounds. Related eyewitnesses are not to be discarded merely because of relationship with the deceased, absent evidence of enmity or false implication, and non-examination of independent witnesses is not fatal where the eyewitness account is otherwise credible. On those principles, the conviction was sustained and the challenge to the acquittal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300269