<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 39 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27780</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee, primarily providing financial assistance to students, did not qualify as an educational institution under section 10(22) but was eligible for exemption under section 11. Consequently, the court ruled against the assessee on the first question in favor of the Revenue and in favor of the assessee on the second question against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 39 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27780</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee, primarily providing financial assistance to students, did not qualify as an educational institution under section 10(22) but was eligible for exemption under section 11. Consequently, the court ruled against the assessee on the first question in favor of the Revenue and in favor of the assessee on the second question against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>