<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 614 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300266</link>
    <description>A preventive detention order is unsustainable if the detaining authority relies on a prior revoked or set-aside order or its grounds instead of fresh or additional material, because that vitiates the requisite subjective satisfaction. It is also invalid where relied-upon documents are not supplied in complete and legible form, since the detenu is denied an effective constitutional opportunity to make a representation. The order further fails where it is based on uncommunicated material or undisclosed factual foundations, because the grounds do not fully disclose the basis of detention. These defects collectively breach the safeguards governing preventive detention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:15:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 614 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300266</link>
      <description>A preventive detention order is unsustainable if the detaining authority relies on a prior revoked or set-aside order or its grounds instead of fresh or additional material, because that vitiates the requisite subjective satisfaction. It is also invalid where relied-upon documents are not supplied in complete and legible form, since the detenu is denied an effective constitutional opportunity to make a representation. The order further fails where it is based on uncommunicated material or undisclosed factual foundations, because the grounds do not fully disclose the basis of detention. These defects collectively breach the safeguards governing preventive detention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>