https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300265 Preventive detention may be sustained even after acquittal or discharge in criminal proceedings on the same or similar facts, because the criminal standard of proof does not control the executive satisfaction required for detention. Prior acquittal therefore does not by itself invalidate a detention order. Where the detention order is regular on its face, supported by the detaining authority's stated personal consideration, and protected by a statutory bar on judicial inquiry, the Court cannot examine the grounds or motives unless fraud, mistake, bad faith, or non-application of mind is affirmatively shown. In the absence of such proof, the detention challenge fails. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:12:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300265 Preventive detention may be sustained even after acquittal or discharge in criminal proceedings on the same or similar facts, because the criminal standard of proof does not control the executive satisfaction required for detention. Prior acquittal therefore does not by itself invalidate a detention order. Where the detention order is regular on its face, supported by the detaining authority's stated personal consideration, and protected by a statutory bar on judicial inquiry, the Court cannot examine the grounds or motives unless fraud, mistake, bad faith, or non-application of mind is affirmatively shown. In the absence of such proof, the detention challenge fails. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Apr 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300265