<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Permits Finalization of 23-Year-Old Fraudulent Export Proceedings; Petitioners&#039; Request to Dismiss Dormant Notice Denied.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61541</link>
    <description>DEEC Scheme - fraudulent export - proceedings initiated, but was not completed during the 23 years - The respondents should be granted liberty to conclude the proceedings. It is the petitioners who have approached the Court to have the impugned show-cause notice set aside. Had the petitioners not invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court, the show-cause notice would have continued to gather dust. The petitioners, in such circumstances, cannot possibly be worse off for seeking a Constitutional remedy and thereby suffer an order to facilitate conclusion of the proceedings which, because of the inordinate delay in its conclusion, is most likely to work out prejudice to them. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:34:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Permits Finalization of 23-Year-Old Fraudulent Export Proceedings; Petitioners&#039; Request to Dismiss Dormant Notice Denied.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61541</link>
      <description>DEEC Scheme - fraudulent export - proceedings initiated, but was not completed during the 23 years - The respondents should be granted liberty to conclude the proceedings. It is the petitioners who have approached the Court to have the impugned show-cause notice set aside. Had the petitioners not invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court, the show-cause notice would have continued to gather dust. The petitioners, in such circumstances, cannot possibly be worse off for seeking a Constitutional remedy and thereby suffer an order to facilitate conclusion of the proceedings which, because of the inordinate delay in its conclusion, is most likely to work out prejudice to them. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:34:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>