<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 794 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417329</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 10B was available where the assessee had obtained the relevant governmental and STPI approvals, including recognition as a hundred per cent export oriented unit, and the CBDT clarification accepted Development Commissioner approval as valid for the section. The deduction could not be denied merely because the approval was not by the concerned statutory board. Deduction under section 10A was also available despite the omission to claim it in the return of income, as the appellate forum could consider the entitlement on the facts and the tax benefit was not defeated by the omission. The Tribunal&#039;s grant of relief under both provisions was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 794 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417329</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 10B was available where the assessee had obtained the relevant governmental and STPI approvals, including recognition as a hundred per cent export oriented unit, and the CBDT clarification accepted Development Commissioner approval as valid for the section. The deduction could not be denied merely because the approval was not by the concerned statutory board. Deduction under section 10A was also available despite the omission to claim it in the return of income, as the appellate forum could consider the entitlement on the facts and the tax benefit was not defeated by the omission. The Tribunal&#039;s grant of relief under both provisions was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>