https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417321 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside several issues for fresh adjudication by the CIT(A) with directions to pass reasoned and speaking orders after proper investigation and verification of facts. The CIT(A) was criticized for passing non-speaking orders without proper examination, leading to the need for a reevaluation of the disputed issues. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417321 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside several issues for fresh adjudication by the CIT(A) with directions to pass reasoned and speaking orders after proper investigation and verification of facts. The CIT(A) was criticized for passing non-speaking orders without proper examination, leading to the need for a reevaluation of the disputed issues. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417321