<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 782 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417317</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s (PCIT) decision to revise the assessment order for the assessment year 2015-16 under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found the assessing officer&#039;s failure to investigate the applicability of section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) rendered the assessment order erroneous. While supporting the PCIT&#039;s revision, the ITAT criticized the PCIT for substituting property valuation without evidence and directed a fresh examination of the section&#039;s applicability, emphasizing an independent inquiry by the assessing officer without undue influence. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 782 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417317</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s (PCIT) decision to revise the assessment order for the assessment year 2015-16 under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found the assessing officer&#039;s failure to investigate the applicability of section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) rendered the assessment order erroneous. While supporting the PCIT&#039;s revision, the ITAT criticized the PCIT for substituting property valuation without evidence and directed a fresh examination of the section&#039;s applicability, emphasizing an independent inquiry by the assessing officer without undue influence. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>