<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 768 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417303</link>
    <description>Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Liquidation Process Regulations, the Tribunal considered whether a liquidation-stage amendment could permit sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern. It accepted the proposal because the secured financial creditor had given in-principle approval, there were no employee or worker claims, and the sale was aimed at preserving the business and maximising stakeholder value. The amendment application was allowed and permission was granted for a going-concern sale. The Tribunal also found an extension of the liquidation timeline appropriate, since liquidation steps were still pending while the sale proposal was pursued, and extended the liquidation period by six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 768 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417303</link>
      <description>Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Liquidation Process Regulations, the Tribunal considered whether a liquidation-stage amendment could permit sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern. It accepted the proposal because the secured financial creditor had given in-principle approval, there were no employee or worker claims, and the sale was aimed at preserving the business and maximising stakeholder value. The amendment application was allowed and permission was granted for a going-concern sale. The Tribunal also found an extension of the liquidation timeline appropriate, since liquidation steps were still pending while the sale proposal was pursued, and extended the liquidation period by six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>