<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1708 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the initiation of proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act was unjustified, and the revaluation profit was not taxable to the partners. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed based on established judicial reasoning and Supreme Court precedent, emphasizing that notional profits from revaluation of assets are not subject to taxation in the partners&#039; hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1708 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the initiation of proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act was unjustified, and the revaluation profit was not taxable to the partners. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed based on established judicial reasoning and Supreme Court precedent, emphasizing that notional profits from revaluation of assets are not subject to taxation in the partners&#039; hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>