<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27771</link>
    <description>Later specific bequests in a will prevailed over an earlier general clause granting the husband only a lifetime right to enjoy income without power of alienation. Applying the construction principle reflected in section 88 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the B, C and D schedule properties were treated as absolutely bequeathed to the named legatees, effective on the testatrix&#039;s death, and the husband&#039;s limited enjoyment clause could not be extended to those properties. On that basis, the deceased acquired no life interest or other interest in those schedules, and their value was not includible as deemed passing under section 9 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:16:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27771</link>
      <description>Later specific bequests in a will prevailed over an earlier general clause granting the husband only a lifetime right to enjoy income without power of alienation. Applying the construction principle reflected in section 88 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the B, C and D schedule properties were treated as absolutely bequeathed to the named legatees, effective on the testatrix&#039;s death, and the husband&#039;s limited enjoyment clause could not be extended to those properties. On that basis, the deceased acquired no life interest or other interest in those schedules, and their value was not includible as deemed passing under section 9 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>